Coalition CanadaMarch 20, 2025; Hill Times by Mandy Kay-Raining Bird and Wil Robertson on behalf of Coalition Canada and Basic Income NOW Atlantic Canada.
What if Canada already had accessible support rapidly available for individuals and families when they needed it? A basic income can be paid for by closing tax loopholes and making our tax system fairer. Read more…
March 21, 2025; Charlottetown Guardian by Barb Boraks, Luc Gosselin and Mandy Kay-Raining Bird and Susan Abells for Coalition Canada.
In tune with Island basic income advocates, Coalition Canada anticipates that other provinces and territories will learn from the P.E.I. experience and build upon its successes by collaborating with the federal government to create their own programs. The long-term outlook is a Canada-wide implementation of a tried-and-true guaranteed basic income. Read more…
March 10, 2025, Halifax Examiner by Sean Casey, Barb Boraks, Herb Emery and Benoît Robidoux.
As the upcoming federal election is likely to focus on important issues such as tariffs and trade and middle-class affordability concerns, we may lose sight of an issue that affects individuals, communities, even our economy: poverty and income insecurity. Read more…
February 27, 2025, Charlottetown Guardian by Marie Burge. Marie works with the Cooper Institute, is a member of the P.E.I. Working Group for a Livable Income since 2003; Coalition Canada basic income revenu de base and Basic Income NOW, Atlantic Canada..
Marie quotes the new Interim Premier, Rob Lantz, offering the heartiest endorsement of a basic income in 2015, and wonders in this Op-Ed whether he still supports basic income, and urging him to fulfil his BIG aspirations of 2015. Read more…
The PEI Working Group for a Livable Income asked five of their members to each write an op ed, which were all published as a series in the Saltwire. The group published these 5 op-eds as a booklet, which can be found here on Coalition Canada’s website.
Wil Robertson, Steering Committee member of Coalition Canada, responded to Senator Diane Bellemare’s article in the Globe and Mail (April 27, 2022), which republished in Atlantic Canada by Huddle Today (May 2, 2022) and in several other Postmedia-owned newspapers in Atlantic Canada, including the Telegraph-Journal in New Brunswick.
In his article, Robertson argues that Bellemare raised many issues and reasons why a basic income should not be considered, but her arguments and facts reflect what many economists, topic experts, advocates, and politicians have noted are either endogenous arguments or facts that have been cherry picked and taken out of context. Read more here…
Quebec Senator and economist Diane Bellemare has written a criticism of basic income [A basic income would be an unfair, complicated and costly way to eliminate poverty, Globe and Mail, April 27, 2022] that is wrong on so many levels that it is hard to respond. In 795 words she has managed to confuse “net” and “gross”, “provincial” and “federal”, and a “universal payment” with a “targeted basic income”.
She reports an immense price-tag for a basic income by imagining that the same amount would be paid to all Canadians, rich or poor, when the entire conversation around basic income in Canada has focused on a modest basic income targeted to those with low incomes. She has declared that a basic income would mean paying everyone the same amount making it impossible to respond to differential needs, even though Bill S-233 explicitly says otherwise. Did BC and Quebec declare that a basic income was not feasible, as she reports? They only investigated a provincial program – not a federal basic income.
Bellemare forgets to mention that current programs (such as provincial social assistance) also have a price-tag attached to them, as do her imagined alternative job training programs. She has invented massive labour market disincentives, even though the Parliamentary Budget Office estimated that a basic income might lead to a reduction in hours worked of 1.3% – hardly an immense effect.
Would, as she declared, a basic income “involve a complete transformation of our income tax system at the federal and provincial levels”? Hardly. Yet, she surveyed Canadians and, having explained to them, on the basis of no evidence whatsoever, that their taxes would double and all deductions would be eliminated, she found (surprise!) that popular support for a basic income declined.
Canadians need to have a real conversation about poverty – without fearmongering or invented “data”. We need to know how our different levels of government can cooperate to best respond to real social needs. It makes little sense to report strong public belief that “all working-age adults in Canada should work to earn a living” when 70% of social assistance rolls are comprised of people with disabilities, some of whom can’t work at all and others who need supports to make work possible. And a Youth Guarantee Program, a Job Path Program and a Professional Training Program, popular as they may be, all have costs attached and little evidence of effectiveness. Parts of this country have been awash in job training programs for decades, but the benefits are hard to find.
Let’s get past the ideology and think about how we can make life better for all Canadians.
Evelyn Forget, Professor
University of Manitoba
Department of Community Health Sciences
Max Rady School of Medicine
Rady Faculty of Health Sciences
Evelyn Louise Forget is a Canadian health economist with expertise in the feasibility of basic income. She has been appointed as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada and an Officer of the Order of Canada for “advancing anti-poverty initiatives in Canada and around the world”. She is the author of the book “Basic Income for Canadians: The Key to a Healthier, Happier and More Secure Life for All“, which was shortlisted for the 2018-19 Donner Prize.
June 8, 2021: The National Inquiry on Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls called for a National Action Plan to be developed. The Core Group established to develop that Plan released its first report on June 3. The Plan identifies the implementation of a basic income guarantee as a priority.
“The presence of guaranteed livable income in the National Action Plan emphasizes the connection between economic marginalization, violence, and the ongoing legacy of colonialism in Canada,” said Senator Pate. See the Senator’s question in the Senate here.
House of Commons petition e-3347, is sponsored by Ontario Liberal MP Han Dong (Don Vally North). It calls on the government “to reduce child poverty and alleviate the hardships faced by children and women in Canada by allowing all children who are residents of Canada access to Canada Child Benefit payments, irrespective of the immigration status of their parents.” Please consider signing this petition today. If 500 Canadian residents sign the petition by May 23, 2021, the government will be forced to answer the question of the MP on this issue.
Elaine Power, Associate Professor at Queens University just published a study on food insecurity among students at Queen’s University. A new book by Elaine Power and Jamie Swift was also released: The Case for Basic Income: Freedom, Security, Justice.